NATURA Meetings 2024
Event Details
Where: The Kampong, National Tropical Botanical Garden at Florida International University, Miami, USA
Host: Dr. Tiffany Troxler (Florida International University, UREx SRN and US LTER)
NATURA Global Roadmap Agenda Overview
Sunday, Feb. 25: General arrival
Mon., Feb. 26: Day 1 workshop
Tues., Feb. 27: Day 2 workshop
Wed., Feb. 28th: General departure
About the Meeting
The Global Roadmap (GRM) for Urban Nature-Based Solutions workshop taking place on 26-27 February 2024 will bring together the different teams of the project (Executive, Advisory and Regional core teams) to achieve three objectives: 1) Review and exchange on regional findings (all teams); 2) Identify cross-regional learnings (all teams); 3) Make progress with regional reports and other outputs (per team). Several parts of the workshop will be focused on collective exchanges, while other parts will allow each regional team to make progress with their outputs in the way that meets their internal needs (we will therefore invite you to coordinate internally in advance). NATURA will support travel and accommodations for invited members of the GRM working group.
NATURA All Hands Meeting Agenda Overview
Tues., Feb. 27: General arrival / NATURA Leadership meeting (Executive Team and Coordinating Committee)
Wed., Feb. 28th: All-Hands Meeting Day 1 | Full day meeting
Thurs., Feb. 29th: All-Hands Meeting Day 2 | Full day meeting
Fri., March 1st: All-Hands Meeting Day 3 | Full day meeting/ general departure
About the Meeting
The aim of this All Hands Meeting is to synthesize recent research and knowledge across NATURA’s regional nodes, TWGs, and networks, including a presentation on the NATURA Global Roadmap for Urban Nature-based Solutions, member-led sessions, and opportunities to further develop writing and research collaborations. This is also a critical opportunity for members to come together to envision the future of the network.
Early-Career Members at the All-Hands Meeting
The NATURA Network would like to open up the opportunity for early-career members to attend this meeting. This will be done by allowing supported invited attendees to transfer their AHM funds to an EC member of their choice. In this scenario, the invited attendee will still be able to attend the meeting using their own funding source outside of NATURA.
Participant Reflections
Participating in the NATURA All Hands Meeting was an enriching experience that allowed for both new connections and the rekindling of existing ones. Throughout the presentations and group discussions, I was inspired by the myriad of innovative approaches presented to tackle the intricate challenges our cities encounter. The abundance of fresh ideas, concepts, and synergies that emerged during our interactions promises to nurture strong bonds and maintain elevated spirits as we collectively strive to generate diverse outputs and forge new collaborations.
What struck me most was the depth of the individual conversations, which allowed for a deeper exploration of the human dimension amidst our shared endeavors. Discussing how we can nurture ourselves, support one another, uplift our communities, and ultimately enhance the vitality of our cities felt profoundly transformative. It became evident that this space is not just about research and professional growth but also about collective reflection and emergence.
I am genuinely excited about the future of NATURA, knowing that it will remain a hub for collaboration and the exchange of ideas for years to come. As we envision and shape the next iteration of NATURA, I eagerly anticipate contributing to and being part of this remarkable journey. I am immensely grateful for the opportunity to belong to this vibrant community and cherish the relationships and insights it continues to offer. Hugs, hugs, and more hugs!
I have been lucky to be involved in NATURA through the Oceania node of the Global Roadmap, the Ecological Resilience Thematic Working Group, and through the Coordinating Committee.
As an Australian, it was amazing to be part of genuinely global experience that takes the diverse needs and perspectives of many people across the global south, north, east and west, seriously. I was also pleasantly surprised how the social sciences and humanities were represented in the workshop. My Australian experience has mostly been in the frustrating gap between urban ecology, environmental psychology and human geography – it was nice to be in a ‘place’ that respected and recognised the importance of multiple ontologies, epistemologies and worldviews.
As a human, social indeed! It was great to reconnect with a few people I rarely get to see face-to-face and bring a whole host of 2-dimensional characters to life in the real world. The workshop was filled with warmth, trust, and respect between all participants.
As a researcher, the value of and for the ECRs was clear and present. Many research endeavours aim to promote or develop ECRs, but few succeed in allowing ECRs to flourish across geographic, disciplinary and transdisciplinary boundaries and to bring their lived experiences to the table quite like we saw this week. And, of course, it was great to connect with colleagues face to face and even get a bit of work done – work that can only be done face to face. (I’m sounding like an Australian again :)
I am now increasingly working across the science-policy divide, and from that perspective it was really great to see a bunch of researchers reflecting and addressing the complex and holistic needs and requirements of policy and programs. Importantly, all effort was being made to ensure the work we discussed and debated was thoughtful and credible. Two-way exchanges like this are critical for the future of good policy-making and programs.
Lastly, we started the workshop being asked for one word to describe our feelings at the time – taking some liberties with this platform at the end of the workshop I have three words: inspiring, illuminating and interconnected!
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. (Grant #1927468 and #1927167). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.